unmukts.com

The Tariff Irony: When the West Buys from Russia, But Blames India

As the world continues to grapple with geopolitical realignments, a fresh chapter unfolds in the dynamic relationship between India and the United States. The latest spark? Allegations from the American leadership that India is profiting from oil trade with Russia, followed by threats of raising tariffs on Indian goods. This move, loaded with irony, demands a closer look—particularly when seen through the lens of trade hypocrisy and strategic necessity.

India’s Energy Trade: A Compulsion, Not a Choice

India’s engagement with Russian oil is not about opportunism—it is about survival. As a rapidly developing economy with over 1.4 billion people, India requires affordable and predictable energy supplies to maintain domestic stability and growth. When the Ukraine conflict disrupted global supply chains, Indian policymakers acted pragmatically. Russian crude, discounted due to sanctions and shifting alliances, offered India an economic lifeline in turbulent times.

This was never a hidden arrangement. In fact, during the early stages of the conflict, the West—including the United States—was not only aware of India’s energy needs but subtly encouraged such purchases to maintain global oil market stability. Today, however, that very pragmatism is being spun as profiteering.

The Double Standards of the West

While fingers point at India, the truth lies in plain sight. The same nations leading the charge of criticism maintain their own trade relationships with Russia—sometimes even more lucratively.

• European Union’s trade with Russia in 2024 exceeded €67 billion in goods, not including €17 billion in services.
• Imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) by Europe reached record highs—16.5 million tonnes, a clear indication of demand, not disapproval.
• The U.S. itself continues to purchase uranium for nuclear power, palladium for electric vehicles, and essential fertilizers and chemicals from Russia.

So when a democratic, transparent country like India is singled out for similar trade behavior, the credibility of the criticism weakens. What India pursues as a necessity, the West continues as convenience.

Strategic Sovereignty Over Global Pressure

India’s foreign policy has long been grounded in strategic autonomy. Whether during the Cold War or amidst the current multipolar world, New Delhi has resisted being pulled into power blocs. Its relationship with Moscow is decades old, based on defense cooperation, energy needs, and historical trust. That legacy cannot be undone by Western discomfort.

India has also increased trade with the U.S., engaging deeply in defense, technology, space, and pharmaceuticals. But friendship should not demand forfeiture of sovereignty. True partnership thrives on respect, not coercion.

Tariffs as Tools of Intimidation?

Threats of economic retaliation via tariffs reflect a growing trend where diplomacy takes a back seat to populism. Tariffs hurt both sides—raising costs for American consumers, straining global supply chains, and souring bilateral ties. When used against allies, they not only appear unjustified but also counterproductive.

India’s growing GDP, crossing 7% annually, stands in stark contrast to the stagnating 1.25% growth in the U.S. If tariffs are meant to contain India’s rise, they will fail. India has diversified trade, built resilient institutions, and formed new partnerships across Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Conclusion: A Test of Maturity in Global Leadership

This moment is not just about oil or tariffs. It is a test of whether global leadership can rise above selective outrage and rediscover the value of balanced diplomacy.

India is not asking for favors. It is demanding fairness. In a world divided by wars and shifting alliances, it chooses to walk a sovereign path, balancing principle with pragmatism.

Instead of punishment, the West should seek partnership. Instead of blame, it should pursue dialogue. Because in today’s interconnected world, targeting India doesn’t just hurt India—it chips away at the very global stability the West claims to protect.